Warning: Use of undefined constant REQUEST_URI - assumed 'REQUEST_URI' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in C:\xampp\htdocs\mbc1\wp-content\themes\jannah4\functions.php on line 73
Supreme Courtroom will hear the plea filed by Ram Mandir on 18th July thursday SC to listen to hearings on Ayodhya case on Thursday, report on mediation panel report – jj
rss

Supreme Courtroom will hear the plea filed by Ram Mandir on 18th July thursday SC to listen to hearings on Ayodhya case on Thursday, report on mediation panel report

[ad_1]

new Delhi: In the Ayodhya land dispute case, the Supreme Court will hear on Thursday (July 18). The Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi will start hearing at 10:30 a.m. The court will look after the report of the mediation panel and order it. If the court panel believes the closure of the arbitration proceedings, then the court can order a hearing every day from July 25.

In fact, in the previous hearing, Parasaran, a lawyer of the Hindu party, Gopal Vishad, had demanded early date court hearing from the Supreme Court and had said that if any agreement is reached, then it is necessary to get the approval of the court. Rajiv Dhawan had opposed on behalf of the Muslim parties and had said that this is not the time to criticize the arbitration process. Rajiv Dhawan had demanded dismissal of the petition to question the mediation process. But Nirmohi Akhara had supported Gopal Singh's petition and said that the mediation process is not moving forward in the right direction.

Earlier, the committee demanded additional time for the mediation process. The Supreme Court gave the committee time till 15 August On March 8, the Supreme Court appointed former judge FM Kalifulla, religion guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and senior lawyer Shriram Panchu as mediator. The court had asked all the parties to try to find the common solution of the matter.

The Supreme Court had said that the panel would end the process within 8 weeks with the process of settling dispute within 4 weeks of arbitration. The Chief Justice had said that the mediation process will be under the supervision of the court and it will be kept confidential. The Supreme Court had said that mediators and people could join the panel if needed. They can also get legal help. Uttar Pradesh Government will provide all facilities to Faizabad in the middle.

Significantly, the Supreme Court had given all the parties 6 weeks to see the translation of the documents and said that in our view, the party can use 8 weeks to resolve the issue through mediation. Last year, the Muslim parties had a major setback to the Supreme Court from the Supreme Court.Court refused to send the constitution bench to the re-consideration of the 1994 Ismail Faruq verdict.

The Muslim parties had demanded reconsideration of the decision of Ismail Faruq, who did not specify the mosque as essential part of Islam for Namaz. It is important that during the movement for Ram temple, on December 6, 1992, the Babri Masjid was demolished in Ayodhya. . In this case, there was a criminal case as well as a civil lawsuit.

The matter related to the title dispute is pending in the Supreme Court
Allahabad High Court had given judgment in the Ayodhya title dispute on 30 September 2010. It was said in the verdict that the disputed land should be divided into 3 equal parts. The place where Ramlalla's idol is, it should be given to the Ramlala Sovereign. Sita kitchen and Ram Chaboota can be given to the Nirmohi Akhara, while one third of the rest of the land will be given to Sunni Waqf Board. After this the matter was reached to the Supreme Court. Ramlal Vajaman and Hindu Mahasabha filed a petition in the Supreme Court on Ayodhya's disputed land.

At the same time, the Sunni Central Waqf Board on the other side also filed an application against the decision of the High Court in the Supreme Court.After this, many other parties had filed petitions in this case. On May 9, 2011, the Supreme Court had banned the order of the Allahabad High Court and asked to hear the case. Courts had ordered to maintain status quo Since then the matter is pending in the Supreme Court.

[ad_2]
Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button
Close