My father was part of an engineering team that designed the housing that held the components for the guidance computer onboard Apollo 11.
Just this morning, I read an article online looking back on the 50 years since man first landed on the moon. I read the story on my iPhone, which holds 100,000 times the processing power of the computer that got Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the lunar surface.
Time and again, we hear how are devices â€“ even the smallest ones â€“ are more powerful than those used by early astronauts.
But this being the year of a significant anniversary, scientists and tech publications have been calculating just how big that gap in power is.
Apollo computer v. iPhone by the numbers
Writing for The Conversation, University of Nottingham computer science professor Graham Kendall added more awe to the historic feat. He compared RAM (Random Access Memory) and ROM (Read Only Memory) for both.
The Apollo Guidance Computer had 32,768 bits of RAM Memory, which comes out to 2,048 words. The computer also held 72KB (equal to 589,824 bits) of ROM (Read Only Memory).
â€œA single alphabetical character â€“ say an â€˜aâ€™ or a â€˜bâ€™ â€“ typically requires eight bits to be stored,â€ Kendal wrote. â€œThat means the Apollo 11 computer would not be able to store this article in its 32,768 bits of RAM. Compare that to your mobile phone or an MP3 player and you can appreciate that they are able to store much more, often containing thousands of emails, songs and photographs.â€
An iPhone with 4GB of RAM (thatâ€™s 34,359,738,368 bits) has more than one million times more memory than the Apollo computer. Comparing ROM memory, a 512GB iPhone is seven million times more powerful than the guidance computer.
The processor on the Apollo 11 computer ran at .043 MHz. The latest iPhone processor runs at an estimated 2,490 MHz, 100,000 times more processing power, Kendall said.
The science publication ZME Science compared processing speeds. Even with the now ancient iPhone 6, Appleâ€™s A8 ARM architecture held about 1.6 billion transistors that processed 3.36 billion instructions per second. That is 120 million times faster than the computer guiding Apollo.
â€œYou wouldnâ€™t be wrong in saying an iPhone could be used to guide (120 million) Apollo-era spacecraft to the moon, all at the same time,â€ author Tibi Puiu wrote for ZME Science. â€œTo be fair, these sort of comparisons arenâ€™t very honorable. Itâ€™s like making a side by side comparison between the first airplanes designed by the Wright Brothers with an F-18 fighter. Sure, both could fly but the two are technologically speaking worlds apart.â€