Jammu and Kashmir Governor Satyapal Malik chatting with the terrorists, kill the corrupt leaders, not the troopers! | kill corrupt politicians-bureaucrat, not jawans: j & okay governor to terrorists
[ad_1]
Satyapal Malik's controversial speech
During a program in Ladakh, Governor Satyapal Malik has appealed to the terrorists to stop making police jawans and SPO their targets in Jammu and Kashmir and do not kill them. Satyapal Malik said in an event organized on Kargil that terrorists kill ordinary citizens. The police kills the soldiers. Kill the SPO. Why do brothers kill their own people, kill them, who have looted your country. Who has looted all the wealth of Kashmir. Have you killed any of them? They are losing their lives in fissile. Nothing to do with it Nothing will come out of the gun. LTTE also did not do anything on the gun.
Have already given similar statements
It is noteworthy that earlier Malik's name had come into controversy when he had said that he was equally hurt at the death of the terrorists. Then they said, 'The police are doing their work well, but if anyone knows, even if it is a terrorist, then I have trouble.'
|
Umar proves to the governor
Meanwhile, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has opened a front against the Governor's controversial statement. He has tweeted, "This person is apparently a responsible person sitting on a constitutional post, asking the terrorists to kill politicians called corrupt, maybe this person has been granted illegal manslaughter and Kangaroo Court approval. Before giving it, you should find out about your image in Delhi. "
State is the President's rule
Significantly, in the state, in June 2018, when the governor had to come to power, when the BJP had withdrawn its support to the PDP coalition government in the state and the Mehbooba-led government had come in a minority. After this there was President's rule in December 2018. Recently, Home Minister Amit Shah had proposed to extend the period of Presidential rule in Jammu and Kashmir by six months. The government's argument is that the assembly in the state is not in existence, hence the bill has to be brought.
[ad_2]
Source link
