Warning: Use of undefined constant REQUEST_URI - assumed 'REQUEST_URI' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in C:\xampp\htdocs\mbc1\wp-content\themes\jannah4\functions.php on line 73
Why Cali householders are dropping insurance coverage – jj
rss

Why Cali householders are dropping insurance coverage

[ad_1]

Two years ago, the California Department of Insurance got a letter complaining about insurance companies’ treatment of consumers regarding wildfires.

The letter, penned by Jamie Court, president of the nonprofit organization Consumer Watchdog, seemed prescient, given the devastating wildfire last fall that killed 85 people and destroyed the town of Paradise. Court called on the department to help protect homeowners facing inadequate coverage and high costs after the previous years’ fires.

“California residents who have seen homes turned to ash are concerned that they may now get burned by their own insurance company,” Court wrote in the October 2017 letter. It turns out that at least some customers living in wildfire-prone areas still can’t get the coverage they need at reasonable prices.

On Monday, my colleague Thomas Fuller and I reported that across the state people are scrambling to prepare for wildfire season, from utilities inspecting and trimming trees throughout their service areas to consumers buying generators and home battery systems. Others have been left to fret over whatever might befall them because of troubles with their insurance company.

The state insurance department does not keep track of the number of homeowners who have lost insurance because of wildfire risks, but the number of complaints it received on the issue has increased steadily over the past eight years, to 276 last year from 41 in 2010.

David McGiffert, of Topanga Canyon in Los Angeles, received a letter from his insurance company, Allstate, just weeks ago, stating that his policy would end in September after more than 20 years as a customer. Other companies want five times the $1,800 a year he pays for his current policy.

“I don’t have any idea what we’re going to do,” McGiffert said. “Our house is our equity. It’s what we have to leave our children.”

In his letter to the insurance department, Court emphasized the need to ensure that homeowners have adequate replacement coverage, but he also called for a review to resolve a “decades-old problem” still facing consumers like McGiffert, a 77-year-old retiree from the film industry.

“Fortunately, existing law provides the options to allow the insurance commissioner to fashion a complete short-term and long-term remedy,” Court stated in the letter.

[ad_2]
Source link

Tags

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button
Close