Warning: Use of undefined constant REQUEST_URI - assumed 'REQUEST_URI' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in C:\xampp\htdocs\mbc1\wp-content\themes\jannah4\functions.php on line 73
Karti Chindabaram – The nation doesn’t want any new shrine on Ayodhya verdict. Karti Chidambaram says India considers want any new temple, church, mosque, gurudwara – jj

Karti Chindabaram – The nation doesn’t want any new shrine on Ayodhya verdict. Karti Chidambaram says India considers want any new temple, church, mosque, gurudwara



oi-Rahul Kumar


Published: Sunday, November 10, 2019, 0:02 (IST)

new Delhi. A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict on Saturday in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute case in Ayodhya. The Supreme Court in its decision made it clear that the temple would be built on the disputed structure of Ayodhya. The Supreme Court's decision has been welcomed by the leaders across the country. Meanwhile, Karti Chidambaram, son of Congress leader and former finance minister P Chidambaram, has said that the country does not need any new shrine.

Karti Chidambaram says India considers need any new temple, church, mosque, gurudwara

Reacting to the Supreme Court's verdict on the Ayodhya dispute, Karti Chindabaram said, "I firmly believe that India does not need a new temple, church, mosque, gurudwara or any place of worship." We have enough places of worship that need restoration, renovation and preservation. On the court's decision, the Congress said that, we support the construction of Ram temple. This decision not only opened the doors for the construction of the temple but also closed the doors for BJP and others to politicize the issue.

When reporters asked Surjewala whether a Ram temple should be built on the land of Ayodhya, he said that the decision of the Supreme Court has come, and yes the temple should be built there itself. The Congress party is in favor of building the temple of Shri Ram. The constitutional bench of the Supreme Court ruled on the Ayodhya dispute. In this bench, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice SA Bobde, Justice Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Abdul Nazeer ruled. The special thing is that this decision has been given unanimously by the five judges.

Explain that the country's largest court gave its verdict on the Ayodhya case on Saturday. The Constitutional Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, while giving the verdict, has rejected the claim of Nirmohi Akhara and Shia Waqf Board. The disputed land has been considered as the right of Ramlala. Also, the Muslim side has been ordered to give land at a different place. The Supreme Court has ordered the government to form a trust.

Maharashtra: NCP bid- We will vote against BJP during majority test

Looking for life partner? Register on India Matrimony – Free Registration!

  • CBI files charge sheet in INX Media case, 14 names including P Chidambaram, Karti
  • "If I was elected BCCI Secretary while being the Home Minister of the Father ..?" Karti Chidambaram got this answer on this stitch
  • Did PM Modi pick up the beach to be photographed, know the real truth of this picture
  • Aircel-Maxis case: Delhi High Court seeks response from Chidambaram and Karti on ED's plea
  • Aircel-Maxis case: ED reaches Karti and P. Chidambaram's anticipatory bail
  • VIDEO: Karti Chidambaram, who appeared in front of ED, came out and said – came to say Happy Dussehra
  • Sonia-Manmohan met Chidambaram, Maharashtra minister must be tight – no compulsion …
  • Chidambaram's birthday today, son Karti wrote a letter, saying – 'no 56 inch one can stop you'
  • Delhi court defers Aircel-Maxis case hearing indefinitely, Chidambaram is accused
  • Relief to P. Chidambaram and Karti in Aircel-Maxis case, special court grants anticipatory bail
  • Karti said on ED's new step – All that is declared with me
  • INX Media Case: ED said – Karti Chidambaram made profit by selling shares, bought property from fund

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button