Warning: Use of undefined constant REQUEST_URI - assumed 'REQUEST_URI' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in C:\xampp\htdocs\mbc1\wp-content\themes\jannah4\functions.php on line 73
Zeitgeist: Shifting Ahead (2011) – jj
ok

Zeitgeist: Shifting Ahead (2011)



Zeitgeist: Moving Forward, by director Peter Joseph, is a feature length documentary work which presents a case for a needed transition out of the current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society. This subject matter transcends the issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and move to relate the core, empirical “life ground” attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a “Resource-Based Economy”. This is a non-commercial work and is available online for free viewing and no restrictions apply to uploading/download/posting/linking – as long as no money is exchanged.

Embedding & sharing is highly encouraged.

Note: Linguistic Team International is the official all-volunteer translation house for The Venus Project and The Zeitgeist Movement. This Repository location contains only fully proofread versions of the transcript & its derived translations, crafted with care by LTI Language Teams. More languages are added as they are completed.

If your language is not yet represented here, consider helping these translation efforts by joining your respective language team at the LTI Forum:

To learn more:

source

Related Articles

40 Comments

  1. The management systems of borrowing .. right. Its naive and not performable. The thought is good but naive. There are alot of stupid people having selfish genes, like if there was a car that was ment for borrowing, some idiot would fuck the car up, what then? New car? Thats the thing of ownership that works. When it your own, all people even the selfish gene people takes care of the subject because its hard to work for it and not smart to then break it. Would the car not be owned, selfish gene people will shit on and in your borrowed item.
      In previous sweden 1940-1970, homogenly populated with blond swedes, you did not need to lock the door, not to your front door, or your car, not your bicycle. Nowadays with immigration from Africa and arab states, and degeneration of the swedish population especially the swedish women, there are now massive gated communities, and gates are rapantly used in larger cities, where previously was none. GDP-boost from the gate-producing companies, crimes are running rampant. Also new doors with new crimeproof-steel-inside-standards are used as standard in all new buildings.

  2. Genetics are the highest factor for criminality and bad behavior. End of discussion. I know of a case of adopted twins in sweden, 2 twins boys from criminal antisocial biological parents, from a subpopulation in southern Europe, they were adopted from birth by 2 good families totally independent of each other. Both children grew up normal lives and to become new dangerous criminals, destroying other peoples lives.
    However i LOVE your part where you talk about GDP and economics. Here in sweden they also talk about the GDP. However in small sweden 10 million swedes, the immigrants from the arab states like Iraq and Afghanistan now consisting of almost 25 % of swedish citizens, an effect of US bombing their home nation and leftist women in power wanting to help "poor boys", are setting schools on fire every day(!) on average 2 schools every day is on fire or partial fire (sweden is nr 1 schoolburning nation in the entire world(!). This is turning out great for the GDP and everyone is happy happy! .. or are they?

  3. Here in the UK we have a tv programme called "Escape to the Country" in which people are shown desirable property that people from cities can move to to reconnect with nature. Thatched cottages etc. with land to keep horses or other animals, develop interests in country crafts, become self sufficient, according to their desires. This is the great British dream for many people here. How will you persuade people to move from their chocolate box environment to prefabricated cities?

  4. Adam Smith did not say supply and demand would be equated by God, the invisible hand is the price mechanism.
    I thought this was a fantastic documentary (beginning with Childhood etc) but once it began with economics; which is something I actually do know something about, which I study. I realized this is absolute crap.

  5. Ok you all talk about how evil and senseless this all is, but how many of you are still buying into it? How many of you are not actually changing your ways to prevent these sort of things from happening?

  6. The politicians and the owners of the government will see this and spread propaganda that it's fantasy and lies in order to perpetuate the system that has kept them wealthy and in power. They only care about now because the majority of the power brokers will be well dead by 2030.

  7. There's not enough room for that shit And if everyone moves to the country-side, where's the production site for solar conductors?

    Our current set up allows for some of us to go out in the countryside and be self-sufficient, but that's mostly possible because everyone else is all shoved together in tight quarters – i.e. cities and the like

  8. Same. And It infuriates me how the momentum that so many black leaders gave us is squandered by People who think they are entitled to something rather than getting out in the streets and fighting for it.(figuratively of course). We are primed to come out of this on top. But most people I know just want to ride it out. And "hope" for the best…

  9. Marx or any of his followers didn't coin the term Moving forward. So why would you attribute it to him? If you watched the video you would understand why you have these predetermined hangups to ideologies that are no worse than free market capitalism. You have been lied to my friend. And the sooner you accept that the sooner you can begin to educate yourself and make your own opinions rather than spitting someone else's up like an over fed baby.

  10. True. there is also enough food to feed every person on the planet. And yet Thousands die every day of malnutrition. And even more die from Dehydration. Because although the world is 70% water. Filtration costs money. And even though it would cost the world bank pennies of their profits to feed and provide drinking water to every human being. They will never do it. Because their business model is maximize profits. Not provide a service to the world.

  11. @46:23 but he was talking about ALLLaboreres Not any specific race of people as we struggle with today. He actually put to paper the deception used against White people who thought they would be allowed to sit at the table of their masters. He lays out that To maintain their authority. ALL of the Race of Laborers would have to be killed. But lets assume he meant to a manageable level (a 500 million being tossed around?). And this leads me to ask the question. that i lack the characters to ask…

  12. Corruption in capitalism is kidden guarden compaired to corruption in socialist societies. Capitalism is imperfect, as the democracy, but there is nothing else physabil is invented. Morover, the inneficiency today is due to socialistic infiltrations in market economy.

  13. Absolutely the same model was proposed in Soviet Union. Planned and scientific economy. BULL SHEET guys. Who decide this "logical" scientific approach? How it will be insurred that this global system approach does not become an instrument (very powerful) in the hands of wrong guys. As in Soviet Union. …It was demonstrated that any, ANY society that tries to overcentralized – becomes innefficient and highly corrupted in about 40 years.

  14. There is no tool: physical (termonuclear reaction) or social-economic instrument (money, debt etc) that is good or bad. This is a WRONG approach! Communism started with SAME arguments ! Nazzi started with the SAME arguments. There are some good ideas, but the general rational IS wrong. The solution is NOT what is proposed. Global resource management System – suggested by the authors is absolutely equivalent with Soviet Union Centralized Planning center (also scientific). It became a crap…

Leave a Reply

Back to top button
Close